Same-sex marriage verdict: What the Supreme Court said?

6h245meo5gagouj1fu7g0bapc9 same-sex-marriage-legalisation-supreme-court-verdict 6iri9op3k3m721i42heqj6r2f5 https-www-onmanorama-com-web-stories https-www-onmanorama-com-acp https-www-onmanorama-com-web-stories-news https-www-onmanorama-com-web-stories-news-2023

Five-judge Constitution bench refuses to grant legal recognition to same-sex marriages.

Apex court emphasized that the matter of same-sex marriage legalization falls within the domain of the Indian Parliament and called for a change in the Special Marriage Act.

While Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul took a stand in favor of the pleas, Justices S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and P S Narasimha expressed their dissent by rejecting them.

Queer is a natural phenomenon known to India from ages. It is neither urban or elitist: Justice D Y Chandrachud

Incorrect to state that marriage is a static and unchanging institution: D Y Chandrachud

Law cannot assume that only heterosexual couples can be good parents. CARA Regulation 5(3) indirectly discriminates against atypical unions. A queer person can adopt only in an individual capacity: DY Chandrachud

WEB STORIES

For More Visit

onmanorama.com/web-stories.html
Tap to Read