Electoral bonds: Petition in SC to confiscate funds received by political parties

The petitioner also sought a direction for constituting a Committee to investigate the alleged 'illegal benefits' conferred on the donors by public authorities.
The petitioner also sought a direction for constituting a Committee to investigate the alleged 'illegal benefits' conferred on the donors by public authorities.
The petitioner also sought a direction for constituting a Committee to investigate the alleged 'illegal benefits' conferred on the donors by public authorities.
New Delhi: A petition has been submitted to the Supreme Court seeking an order to confiscate funds received by political parties through the electoral bonds scheme. The petitioner, Khem Singh Bhati, stated that on February 15, the court, in the case of Association for Democratic Reforms versus Union of India, struck down the electoral bonds scheme, deeming it unconstitutional under Articles 14 and 19.
Additionally, the court instructed the State Bank of India (SBI) to cease issuing electoral bonds from the date of the ruling and mandated the disclosure of details concerning bonds purchased from April 12, 2019, to the judgment date.
"It is submitted that the amount received by the political parties through electoral bonds was neither 'donation' nor 'voluntary contribution'; rather it was 'barter money' received from various corporate houses by way of 'quid pro quo' for the undue benefits granted at the cost of the public exchequer," the plea alleged.
The plea - drawn by senior advocate Vijay Hansaria and filed through advocate Jayesh K Unnikrishnan - claimed the details of the purchase and encashment of the electoral bonds clearly show that money paid through electoral bonds by the companies to the political parties, "was either to avoid criminal prosecution or to get monetary advantage by way of contract or other policy matters."
"The political parties have misused their position, being the ruling party in the Government and procured Electoral Bonds behind the iron curtain. They have used Electoral Bond as a tool and method to extract money, by conferring undue advantage to corporate houses by way of compromising their criminal prosecution or granting State largesse, at the cost of public exchequer and against public interest," it alleged.
The petitioner also sought a direction for constituting a Committee headed by a former judge of the apex court to investigate the alleged "illegal benefits" conferred on the donors by public authorities.
The plea in the alternative sought direction to the Income Tax Authorities to reopen to assessment of respondent Nos. 4 to 25 (political parties) from the Financial Year 2018 - 2019 to 2023 - 2024 and disallow the exemptions of income tax claimed by them under section 13A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and levy income tax, interest and penalty on the amount received by way of Electoral Bonds.
On February 15, in a landmark judgement that delivered a big blow to the government, the top court annulled the electoral bonds scheme for political funding, saying it violates the Constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression as well as the right to information. In its verdict months ahead of the Lok Sabha polls, the apex court had ordered the SBI to disclose to the Election Commission the names of the contributors to the six-year-old scheme.
(With PTI Inputs)