Assembly ruckus case: 2 months deadline for crime branch

The ruckus in the Kerala Legislative Assembly on March 13, 2015. File photo: Manoj Chemancheri / Manorama

Thiruvananthapuram: The crime branch has submitted an interim report on the Kerala Assembly ruckus case of 2015 at the Thiruvananthapuram Chief Judicial Magistrate court.

A deadline of two months was given to the investigation team after former MLA N Shakthan informed the crime branch investigation team of his inconvenience in giving a statement. He told the crime branch that he would be able to give a statement only after consulting the party.

The statements of doctors from the Medical College Hospital and the General Hospital, who treated the injured MLAs, have been recorded. Though a notice was issued seeking a report on minister V Sivankutty’s injury, it has not yet been provided to the crime branch by the Medical College Hospital. The statements from the watch and ward at the Assembly have been recorded too.

The report submitted by crime branch DySP Sajeev assured the investigation will be completed within the two months granted by the court.

The interim report has been filed as per the court’s direction to the probe team when further investigation was allowed in the case. Minister Sivankutty and other left leaders E P Jayarajan, K T Jaleel, K Ajith, K Kunjahammed, and C K Sivadasan are listed accused in the case. The case against them is that they created a ruckus in the Assembly during the budget presentation by the then finance minister K M Mani on March 13, 2015, and vandalised public property worth Rs 2.20 lakh.

The court had granted permission for further investigation in the case as per police’s request on June 6. Besides, the court also said there should be no change or amendment to the present list of accused and the charge-sheet.

Before giving a deadline of two months to complete the probe, the court had strongly criticised the crime branch for seeking further investigation in 2023 for a case in which the charge-sheet was filed way back in 2016.

The next hearing in the case is on August 17.

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Onmanorama. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.