Aadu 3 review: Shaji Pappan and gang are still fun, but the film struggles to match its own legacy
One of the film’s boldest choices is its dual timeline structure. Alongside the present-day misadventures of Shaji Pappan and his gang, we are given a parallel narrative set centuries in the past, meant to shed light on certain backstories and expand the film’s universe.
One of the film’s boldest choices is its dual timeline structure. Alongside the present-day misadventures of Shaji Pappan and his gang, we are given a parallel narrative set centuries in the past, meant to shed light on certain backstories and expand the film’s universe.
One of the film’s boldest choices is its dual timeline structure. Alongside the present-day misadventures of Shaji Pappan and his gang, we are given a parallel narrative set centuries in the past, meant to shed light on certain backstories and expand the film’s universe.
About ten minutes into Aadu 3, when Shaji Pappan finally makes his grand entry, the theatre reacts exactly the way you’d expect. The familiar background score kicks in, the slow-motion walk lands, and for a brief stretch, it feels like no time has passed since the gang last stumbled their way into trouble. That initial wave of nostalgia is one of the film’s biggest strengths. It reminds you how deeply these characters have seeped into pop culture. The challenge, however, is sustaining that energy once the novelty of their return wears off.
The earlier Aadu films worked because they wasted no time. Chaos wasn’t something that arrived midway; it was the starting point. Here, director Midhun Manuel Thomas opts for a more gradual build-up. The first half is largely dedicated to reintroducing the characters and re-establishing their dynamics. While there is a certain comfort in revisiting these familiar faces, the pacing during this stretch feels uneven. Scenes linger longer than they need to, and the narrative takes its time finding a clear direction, which can make the opening hour feel surprisingly low on momentum for a franchise known for its relentless energy.
One of the film’s boldest choices is its dual timeline structure. Alongside the present-day misadventures of Shaji Pappan and his gang, we are given a parallel narrative set centuries in the past, meant to shed light on certain backstories and expand the film’s universe. It is an interesting idea and suggests a desire to push the franchise into new territory. The problem is that the historical portions rarely match the immediacy or humour of the present-day track. They feel more like an explanatory detour than an organically gripping thread, and the frequent shifts between timelines disrupt the comedic rhythm just when it begins to settle.
Jayasurya slips back into Shaji Pappan with effortless ease. His performance retains the swagger, the exaggerated bravado and the comic timing that made the character iconic. Even when the writing gives him familiar beats rather than new shades, he manages to keep the character engaging through sheer screen presence. Saiju Kurup’s Arakkal Abu and Dharmajan Bolgatty’s Captain Cleetus also deliver moments that recall why the trio worked so well together in the first place. Their chemistry remains intact, and some of the film’s better laughs come simply from watching them react to each other.
That said, one of the film’s noticeable shortcomings is its reluctance to evolve these characters in any meaningful way. Apart from physical changes and a few references to past events, they remain largely the same people doing largely the same things. In a third instalment, this static quality begins to show. The supporting characters, including Vinayakan’s Dude and Sunny Wayne’s Satan Xavier, appear more as nostalgic callbacks than as active participants in the story. Their presence is welcome, but the script does not give them enough to do for their appearances to leave a strong impact.
The humour, which was once the franchise’s biggest weapon, is more inconsistent this time. There are still flashes of the absurd, situational comedy that defined the earlier films, especially in the second half. But several jokes feel stretched out, losing their punch in the process. A few pop-culture references, including a line about Minnal Murali, land as mildly dated rather than sharply funny, highlighting how quickly comedic tastes and contexts can shift over a decade.
From a technical standpoint, Aadu 3 is more ambitious than its predecessors. The film attempts a larger scale, particularly in the period sequences, with more elaborate sets and broader visual scope. The cinematography is clean and functional, though it rarely does anything particularly inventive with framing or movement. Some of the visual effects in these segments are serviceable but not always convincing, occasionally pulling the viewer out of the moment rather than enhancing it.
Music has always been central to the Aadu brand, with earlier tracks becoming cultural fixtures. In comparison, the songs here feel less memorable. They blend into the narrative rather than standing out as moments that demand repeat listening. The background score still carries echoes of the franchise’s signature sound, but it is used more sparingly, which sometimes reduces the sense of manic fun that once defined the films.
The second half does improve matters. As the narrative finally gathers pace and the gang finds itself in increasingly complicated situations, the film starts to resemble the chaotic ride audiences associate with the series. There are stretches here where the timing of the gags and the interplay between characters click into place, offering glimpses of the old magic. Just as the film seems to be building toward a bigger payoff, it arrives at a climax that feels abrupt, more like a pause than a conclusion.
This is partly because Aadu 3 functions as the first half of a two-part story. Much of what happens here is setup, positioning characters and conflicts for what is clearly intended to be a more dramatic follow-up. While this approach allows for a broader narrative canvas, it also means that this instalment, taken on its own, feels somewhat incomplete.
Aadu 3 is not without its enjoyable moments. The characters are still inherently funny, Jayasurya’s presence still carries weight, and there are enough scattered laughs to remind you why the franchise built such a loyal fanbase. But it also feels like a film caught between nostalgia and reinvention, trying to scale up its world while holding on to the loose, chaotic spirit that made the earlier films work. In doing so, it delivers a watchable but uneven chapter that leans heavily on past goodwill while promising that the real fireworks may be reserved for what comes next.