SC has 'accepted' there was corruption in Rafale deal, claims Rahul Gandhi

SC has 'accepted' there was corruption in Rafale deal, claims Rahul Gandhi
Congress president Rahul Gandhi addresses to media after filing his nomination papers for Amethi Lok Sabha seat, in Amethi, Wednesday. PTI

Amethi (UP): Buoyed by the Supreme Court order allowing petitioners seeking a review of the Rafale judgment to rely on leaked documents, Congress president Rahul Gandhi claimed the SC has made it clear that Prime Minister Narendra Modi committed a theft.

Rahul Gandhi then challenged Modi to a debate on the Rafale military aircraft deal, which the Congress claims involved corruption, a charge repeatedly rejected by the government.

Gandhi recalled a recent interview by the prime minister, in which Modi had said the Supreme Court had given a clean chit to his government on the Rafale deal.

Now the SC has made it clear that 'chowkidarji' (watchman) has committed a theft, Gandhi told reporters here after filing his nomination papers from the Amethi Lok Sabha constituency.

He claimed the apex court has accepted that there is some corruption in Rafale.

The apex court, which had earlier cleared the Modi government of accusations of corruption over the Rafale deal, Tuesday said it will hear a review petition on the basis of the new documents, referred to by the petitioners.

But Gandhi appeared to interpret the order as an acceptance by the Supreme Court that there was corruption in the deal on the French aircraft.

"I am happy and I have been saying so for months that Hindustan's PM has given the air force money to (industrialist) Anil Ambani, and the SC has accepted it. The SC is going to investigate it," he said.

I want to directly challenge that the SC has said that you have indulged in corruption, he said.

Come let's debate... the country wants to know about corruption, the Rafale deal, demonetisation and Amit Shah's son."

The reference was to Jay Shah. Last year, a newspaper portal had claimed that his firm recorded a huge increase in turnover after the BJP-led government came to power.

Jay Shah had then filed a defamation suit against the news organisation.

Gandhi claimed that Modi will not be able to look him in the eye if the two debate the Rafale deal.

I want to thank the SC. It's a very happy day. The SC has talked about justice. Justice has prevailed," he added.

BJP accuses Rahul of contempt of court

Accusing Congress president Rahul Gandhi of gross contempt of court, the BJP on Wednesday said he attributed to the Supreme Court what it had never said in its order on the Rafale deal.

Addressing a press conference, senior party leader and Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said, "The Congress president probably doesn't read even half a paragraph of the court's order, but here, by saying that the court has has said 'chowkidaar chor hai', it is verging on contempt of court."

The president of a party which has been in power for so many years has shown his frustration by attributing words to the apex which were not uttered, she said.

The minister added that the court order was limited to whether it should consider the documents the government said were illegally obtained by petitioners.

Taking a potshot at Gandhi, she said he is out on bail and was accompanied at his nomination filing in Amethi by "the family" - as described Christen Michel, an alleged middlemen in VVIP chopper deal.

Gandhi has crossed the line of decency in his comments on the court, she said, adding that he is repeatedly misleading people on the Rafale fighter jet deal.

Asked whether the court order is a setback for the government, Sitharaman said, "Not at all."

She said things would now become crystal clear.

Read more India news

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Onmanorama. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.