Riyas Moulavi murder case: Govt to file appeal against acquittal of all accused

All three accused in the murder case were acquitted by Kasaragod court. Photo: Manorama

Thiruvananthapuram: The state government has decided to file an appeal challenging the Kasaragod District Principal Sessions Court's order acquitting all three accused in the 2017 Riyas Moulavi murder case. As per reports, the Advocate General (AG) is entrusted with initiating further proceedings for the same. The AG has been asked to move the petition without any delay.

Kasaragod Principal Sessions Court Judge K K Balakrishnan acquitted Akhilesh, Nidhin, and Ajesh, all three residents of Kelugude, in the case. The accused spent seven years in jail without bail.

Mohammed Riyas Maulavi, a 34-year-old muezzin (a person who proclaims the Islamic call to prayer) and madrassa teacher from nearby Choori, was found murdered in his room in the mosque on March 20, 2017. His throat was allegedly slit by a gang which had entered the compound of Muhayuddin Juma masjid of Choori.

The court in its order said the prosecution was not able to prove that the accused had any kind of enmity with the Muslim community.

"Moreover, the prosecution side failed to establish any kind of connection of the accused with RSS," the court said.

The court noted that the phones seized from the accused and prosecution witnesses were analysed but nothing useful was found.

"The failure of the investigating officers to investigate with respect to the contents and data of above said phone materials casts serious doubt on the manner in which the investigation was started, conducted and concluded," the court said.

It said the prosecution spoiled "one of the best opportunities" to know "with whom the deceased had interacted. The silence in this matter itself is sufficient to uproot the prosecution allegations. Therefore, it can be safely concluded that the investigation is not up to the standard and one-sided. So, the accused are entitled benefit of doubt," the court said.

It said the offences committed by them were not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

"Therefore the prosecution failed to prove that the victim was murdered by the accused beyond," it said.

Hence the offences u/s 449, 302, 153A, 295, 201 r/w 34 of IPC charged against the accused have not been sufficiently proven beyond reasonable doubt and therefore they are not guilty for these offences, the court said in its order.

Meanwhile, the prosecution expressed disappointment over the verdict and claimed that all evidence was submitted.

"There was strong evidence in the case. Maulavi's blood was found on the clothes of one of the accused. A piece of fabric belonging to Maulavi was found on the knife used by the accused. We had submitted all the evidence," the prosecutor in the case told PTI.

The court examined 97 witnesses, 215 documents and 45 material evidence in the case in which the charge sheet was filed within 90 days.


The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Onmanorama. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.