BJP protests not against women's entry at Sabarimala? Rajagopal says so

BJP protests not against women's entry at Sabarimala? Rajagopal says so
BJP's lone MLA in Kerala Rajagopal said that the protests were against the lack of basic amenities at the hill-top shrine.

Thiruvananthapuram: Lone BJP MLA in the Kerala Assembly, O Rajagopal, has said that the Sabarimala protests were against the police high-handedness and not against women's entry at the hill shrine

"The protests at Sabarimala were not over the women's entry issue," the former Union minister told a TV channel, adding that they were against the lack of basic amenities at the hill-top shrine.

BJP state chief P S Sreedharan Pillai had earlier declared that they were halting the protests at Sabarimala and taking it to the front of the secretariat here, a move which the opposition Congress has dubbed 'a compromise between the ruling LDF and the right-wing parties'.

"The agitation in front of the secretariat is BJP's political protest. Shifting to the secretariat was part of intensifying the protest and not compromising,"Rajagopal said.

Pillai had expressed similar views and said that the Sabarimala protests was against the CPM-led LDF government and not against the Supreme Court decision, allowing entry of women of all age groups into the shrine.

Meanwhile, BJP leader and Rajya Sabha MP V Muraleedharan said that no BJP leader or worker would agree to compromise with the CPM on the protest.

"None of the BJP leaders and workers, who have self-respect, will agree to compromise the Sabarimala protest," he said.

However, it was learnt that the state RSS unit was also unhappy with the BJP leadership over the manner in which the arrest of party's state general secretary K Surendran was dealt with.

Pillai had earlier faced flak from within his party over the lack of vigor in protests against the arrest of Surendran from the base camp at Nilakkal.

The Supreme Court will hear in open court on January 22 a batch of review petitions on the matter.

The top court had on September 28 paved the way for entry of women of all age groups into the Sabarimala temple, saying that the ban on entry of women of child-bearing age amounted to gender discrimination.

Surendran was once again denied bail in a case related to the attack on a 52-year-old woman who came to visit the shrine during the Chithira Atta festival earlier this month.

Sabarimala
Sabarimala had witnessed unprecedented protests.

Meanwhile, the Pathanamthitta district administration, under which Sabarimala falls, has extended the prohibitory orders till December 4.

The shrine has been under a heavy security blanket since November 17, the day when it was opened for the annual two-month-long pilgrimage season.

The police had said that the restriction was in the backdrop of the frenzied protests witnessed at the shrine over the state government's decision to implement the September 28 apex court order.

×
The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Onmanorama. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.