Kevin murder case sentence to be handed down on August 27

Neenu
Neenu, Kevin's fiance.

Kottayam: The Kottayam Municipal Sessions Court will hand down the sentence of the sensational Kevin murder case on Tuesday.

The court had convicted 10 of the 14 accused for honour killing on August 22. This is the first conviction for honour killing in Kerala.

The 10 convicted persons are Sanu Chacko, brother of Kevin's fiance Neenu, Niyas Moran, Ishan Ismail, Riyas, Manu, Shefin, Nishad, Fazil and Shanu Shajahan. Neenu's father Chacko John and three others-Ramiz Sherif, Shinu Shajahan, Vishnu-were acquitted.

The court had ruled that Kevin's murder was a clear case of honour killing. The charges slapped on the convicts include murder, kidnapping and trespassing.

Reacting to the order, Kevin's father said that it was unfortunate that four of the accused, including Neenu's father, have been let off.

"I will react once the punishment is announced on Saturday. We are not happy that her father and three others have been let off. We will contest this," said Kevin's father.

Kottayam Superintendent of Police Harisankar, who led the investigating team, said the police were happy that this tough case has been solved, and were now waiting to see the full judgement as to how the four acquittals happened.

"It was a tough case because we had to work on circumstantial evidence. The hard work done by our team has paid off," Harisankar said.

The preliminary hearing of the case which began on February 13, 2019 was completed last month. The trial had to be completed in a span of six months as the case was deemed an honour killing. The court had confirmed that 24-year-old Kevin P Joseph was killed in a bid protect the honour of the family of the prime accused.

The charge-sheet of the case says that Kevin, a Dalit Christian from Kottayam, was kidnapped and murdered by a gang led by Sanu Chacko, brother of Kevin's fiance Neenu Chacko on May 27, last year.

Sanu was the prime accused while his father Chacko was the fifth accused.

Kevin had met Neenu while she pursued a course in a Kottayam college. Two days before the murder, the two of them had filed a joint application for marriage registration at a sub-registrar office in Kottayam as the family of the girl had fiercely objected to their marriage. Neenu's family later registered a complaint with the police stating that she had gone missing. Though the police summoned the two, Kevin and his cousin Anish left the girl back at her hostel as she confirmed that she intended to go with Kevin.

Thereafter, the armed gang, which arrived in three vehicles, reached Kottayam and vandalised Kevin's house and forcibly took away him and Anish, a native of Kalambukattuchira at Mannanam. The abductors thrashed Anish severely and left him on the way.

Kevin's body was found in a river in Kollam district on May 28. His relatives alleged that he was tortured and killed.

His family had alleged that laxity on the part of the local police in taking action on a man-missing complaint filed by Neenu had resulted in the gruesome death of the youth.

Sub-inspector M S Shibu and ASI Sunnymon of the Gandhinagar police station were suspended while Kottayam district superintendent of police V M Mohammed Rafique was transferred following the incident.

The post-mortem conducted at the Kottayam Medical College hospital had found that there were 16 cuts and bruises on Kevin's body.

The findings of the police inquiry and the post-mortem say that Kevin drowned in the Chaliyakkara river while he was trying to escape from the gang. But doubts remain whether Kevin died after falling in the river while running at night or if he was beaten by the goons and dumped in the river after death.

The 14 accused in the case include Sanu Chacko, Niyas Mon (Chinnu), Ishan Ismail, Riyas Ibrahimkutty, Chacko John, Manu Maraleedharan, Sheffin Sajad, N Nishad, Titu Jerome, Vishnu (Appunni), Fazil Sheriff, Shanu Shahjahan, Ramiz Sherif.

In all 238 documents, 55 pieces of evidence and 113 witnesses have been examined by the court so far. The mobile phone records of the accused, mobile phone photos, CCTV visuals from four different locations and the speed camera records provided by the Motor Vehicles Department proved crucial in the case.

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Onmanorama. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.