Analysis | UDF rides 'anti-Pinarayi' wave to victory, emerges Mamkootathil-Jamaat stain-less
Mail This Article
Kochi: In a verdict that reads less like a civic poll victory and more like a political statement, the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) has staged a spectacular comeback in the Kerala local body polls. Widely viewed as the "semi-final" before next year’s Assembly elections, the results have delivered a decisive knockout blow to the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF), shattering its decade-long dominance in both urban and rural power centres.
The numbers tell the story of a complete reversal of the 2020 mandate. The UDF has captured four of the six Municipal Corporations -- reclaiming Kochi, Thrissur, and Kannur, and storming the CPM fortress of Kollam. The wave of support extended deep into the state's administrative fabric, with the UDF winning 54 of the 87 municipalities and securing 505 of the 941 grama panchayats, a massive leap from trailing the Left five years ago.
The coalition also effectively split the rural administration, securing 79 of the 152 Block Panchayats and seven of the 14 District Panchayats. This resurgence mirrors the historic "pro-UDF wave" of 2010, which paved the way for Oommen Chandy’s ascent to power in 2011 Assembly polls, a history the UDF leadership is now projecting as the blueprint for 2026.
'Anti-Pinarayi' sentiment and ‘arrogance’ of power
The underlying current of this election was intense anti-incumbency, often manifesting specifically as anti-government and "anti-Pinarayi" sentiment. The narrative of an "arrogant government" stuck, alienating voters even in traditional Left strongholds. A defining symbol of this disconnect in the recent past was the government’s handling of the controversial ASHA workers' protest for a hike in their honorarium. While the LDF administration was perceived as dismissive and rigid, the UDF approached the protestors with a "humane" touch, successfully positioning themselves as the empathetic alternative to an unfeeling regime. This contrast in approach allowed the Opposition to tap into the frustrations of the common electorate, who used the ballot to warn the Pinarayi government.
New Congress under Sunny Joseph and Satheesan
The victory was not merely a result of the ruling front's failures but also a testament to the "New Congress" vision under the leadership of Opposition Leader VD Satheesan and KPCC Working President Sunny Joseph. The party displayed rare organisational discipline, moving away from the nepotism and favouritism that had plagued candidate selections in previous polls. This time, candidate selection was meritocratic, based on grassroots-level lists from the ward level up.
This strategy facilitated the return of heavyweights to the civic fray, sending a message that local governance was a priority. Notable victories included former Congress MLA Anil Akkara, who won from the Adat panchayat in Thrissur, and K Sabarinadhan, who secured the Kowdiar ward in Thiruvananthapuram Corporation. Their wins underscored a shift in mindset that stepping into local bodies is not a demotion but a strategic necessity.
Furthermore, the state leadership entrusted senior KPCC members with coordinating specific districts well in advance, allowing the party to function with corporate-style management efficiency. This "do or die" desperation created a unity that neutralised the threat of rebels. Although turncoats emerged across the state as usual, especially in Thiruvananthapuram, Kochi Corporation, and Kozhinjambara panchayat, after candidate declarations, they failed to derail the UDF’s momentum unlike the past.
Defusing Mamkootathil and Jamaat bombs
The UDF’s crisis management skills were tested severely during the campaign, particularly regarding the Rahul Mamkootathil controversy. The LDF attempted to weaponise the rape allegations against the MLA, with the Chief Minister himself tearing into the Congress, calling Mamkootathil a "sexual pervert" and accusing the leadership of protecting him. However, the UDF countered with a calibrated response. Instead of reacting prematurely, they waited for the legal process to unfold and expelled Mamkootathil immediately after the Thiruvananthapuram district court rejected his anticipatory bail plea. This timely action allowed the party to claim the moral high ground and blunted the LDF’s attack, preventing internal division among workers.
Similarly, Pinarayi Vijayan’s attempt to brand the UDF’s alleged understanding with the Jamaat-e-Islami as an alliance with “communal powers” backfired spectacularly. The narrative was dismantled by Jamaat-e-Islami Kerala Amir P Mujeeb Rahman, who publicly reminded the Chief Minister of the Jamaat’s support for the LDF in the 1996, 2004, 2009, Lok Sabha elections and the 2006 and 2011 Assembly polls. Dismissing Vijayan's claims as a “lie” and a “delusion”, Rahman even recalled a meeting between Vijayan and then Amir T Arif Ali at the Alappuzha guest house in 2011. This rebuttal effectively exposed the LDF’s double standards, rendering their “secular” outrage ineffective.
Weaponizing faith, 'Swarnapali' effect
Crucially, the UDF successfully turned the Sabarimala gold theft controversy into a lethal political weapon. By framing the theft of temple gold and the subsequent arrests of Travancore Devaswom Board officials, including former president and CPM leader A Padmakumar, as acts of “sacrilege” and “corruption”, the Opposition painted the LDF as a “thief” stealing from Lord Ayyappa. The narrative was emotionally charged, portraying the government as disrespectful to the faith -- a wound still fresh from the 2018 Sabarimala women's entry agitation.
The campaign reached a fever pitch with the release of the viral rap-like animated video on Sabarimala gold theft just days before the polls, while supporters changed their social media profile pictures to demand justice for the stolen gold of ‘Lord Ayyappa’.
The LDF tried to deflect this by reviving the 1985 Thiruvabharanam disappearance case at Guruvayur Temple. CPM state secretary MV Govindan quoted the Justice Krishnanunni Commission report to accuse the then Karunakaran government of negligence. However, Opposition Leader VD Satheesan swiftly neutralised this, dismissing the allegation as a desperate diversion and clarifying that the main necklace had been recovered years ago. By labelling the CPM narrative as “completely false”, the UDF kept the spotlight firmly on the current administration's corruption.
Road to 2026
The UDF also effectively countered the LDF’s development narrative by highlighting hypocrisy, particularly regarding the Vizhinjam Port, which is a project the CPM vehemently opposed alleging corruption when in Opposition, only to celebrate it as their own achievement with an elaborate inaugural ceremony once in power.
For the UDF, this victory is more than just a civic triumph; it is the launchpad for their return to the state secretariat. UDF convener Adoor Prakash summed up the mood cautiously, noting that while the victory would be celebrated, arrogance had no place in the future strategy. "It is the curtain-raiser towards the 2026 Assembly polls, and we will have to ensure the same result across Kerala," he said.
The message from the electorate is unambiguous. The UDF has successfully converted the local body polls into a referendum on the government, proving that the LDF's “development” shield has cracked under the weight of corruption allegations and perceived arrogance. With the cadres energised and the “semi-final” won, the UDF believes the path to repeating the 2011 history in 2026 is now wide open.
